Saturday, September 26, 2015

Prof. Joan Woodward - Biography and Contribution

Joan Woodward (September 27, 1916 – 1971) was a British professor in organization sociology

Joan Woodward undertook her research at South East Essex College of Technology. She  joined Imperial College in 1957 as a part-time lecturer in Industrial Sociology and was appointed to a Senior Lectureship in the Production Engineering Section in 1962. Woodward was a leading academic and researchers  in the field of Organization Theory. Woodward was a pioneer for empirical research in organizational structures and author of analytical frameworks that establish the link between technology and production systems and their role in shaping effective organizational structures. She classified the technology into Unit based or (Small scale), Mass based or (large scale) and Continuous process organizations. In 1969, she was appointed  as Professor of Industrial Sociology and Director of the Industrial Sociology Unit.

Her work received international recognition, leading to an invitation to join a group of the top seven organization theorists that was called the Magnificent Seven. In 1970, Prof. Woodward published a book "Industrial Organization: Behaviour and Control".  This text contains description of  the complete work of her research group since 1962.

Woodward died in 1971, aged 54 due to breast cancer. She was the second woman to receive a chair at Imperial College and she  is a role model for women in science, engineering and technology.I

The bi-annual Joan Woodward Memorial Lecture takes place at Imperial College Business School. The Joan Woodward Prize is bestowed annually on an undergraduate or post-graduate undertaking a thesis in a topic that matches the research interests of Joan Woodward.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joan_Woodward



ndustrial Organization
Theory and Practice
Second Edition
Joan Woodward
Introduction by Dorothy Wedderburn and Sandra Dawson
288 pages | text-figures, tables | 216x138mm
978-0-19-874122-0 | Paperback | 18 December 1980
http://ukcatalogue.oup.com/product/9780198741220.do


http://www.provenmodels.com/39/technology-typology/joan-woodward

Prof. Sumantra Ghoshal - Biography and Contribution

Sumantra Ghoshal
Birthday 26 September 1948

Death 3 March 2004  Hampstead, United Kingdom due to Brain Haemorrage


Sumantra Ghoshal was born in Calcutaa. He attended the Ballygaunge Government High School, and graduated from Delhi University with Physics major and attended the Indian Institute of Social Welfare and Business Management.

He started his career in Indian Oil Corporation. He went ot United States on a Fulbright Fellowship and Humphrey Fellowship in 1981. Ghoshal was awarded an M.S. and a PhD by  the MIT Sloan School of Management in 1983 and 1985 respectively. He  was  awarded a D.B.A. degree from Harvard Business School in 1986. He worked on these two doctoral degrees at the same time, writing two distinct dissertations on two different topics

In 1985, he joined INSEAD Business School in France. He  wrote a number of influential articles and books. In 1994, he joined the London Business School. Ghoshal was a Fellow of the Advanced Institute of Management Research (AIM) in the U.K.


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sumantra_Ghoshal

http://www.theguardian.com/news/2004/mar/08/guardianobituaries.india

https://www.london.edu/faculty-and-research/subject-areas/strategy-and-entrepreneurship/sumantra-ghoshal-conference-2015/about-sumantra-ghoshal#.VgZ1vtKqqko

http://www.economist.com/node/13760551

Friday, September 18, 2015

Henry Varnum Poor - Early Management Thinker - 1850




Based on the Article
By Alfred D. Chandler, Jr.

Henry Varnum Poor worked as the editor of the American Railroad Journal from 1849 to 1862 and
later published  Poor's Manual of the Railroads of the United States.

As editor, Poor made special studies of construction, finance, operation, and , administration. Of the major problems discussed in the pages of the Journal those raised by the beginning of large-scale private finance, at first fully occupied his attention.  He was the first American to analyze with care and intensiveness many of the basic problems of modern big business.

During the years 1845 to 1849 he had actively helped his brother, John Alfred Poor, build one of New England's most  important railroads, the Atlantic and St. Lawrence, which connected Portland with Montreal. In this work he acquired a valuable first hand understanding of what the construction of a railroad in a semi-frontier area of the United States involved and what specific problems of promotion, organization, construction, and financing had to be met.  He also has intellectual training. Through his brother-in-law, Frederick Henry Hedge, one of the initiators of the Transcendental movement,  Poor came to know
personally Ralph Waldo Emerson, the Channings, Theodore Parker, George Ripley, and other intellectual leaders of the day and became imbued with their buoyant, optimistic belief in man's progress and perfection.
Poor came to  believe that God had given man a mind as the means for his perfection. Man's mind was stronger than the currently existing man-made institutions and could alter the institutions which had brought sin and evil  into the world. The mind must be carefully trained and disciplined both intellectually and morally.


To Henry Poor the coming of the industrial and transportation revolutions was an example where
men by creatively applying their minds to the labor-saving machine were making strides towards the physical perfection that was the first and necessary step to intellectual and spiritual The railroad was having the most profound effect.  By lowering the cost of transportation and by making possible widespread commercial agriculture and large-scale industry, the railroad was making food, clothing, and the other necessities of life plentiful to all classes of For Henry Poor, then, the efficient construction and operation of the American railroad system was even more a moral than an economic necessity, and throughout his life his moral indignation was thoroughly aroused when incompetence or dishonesty hampered effective railroad operation.

When the decade of the fifties opened, the investment market had not yet been standardized. Finance was the major problem of the railroad industry at that time. The new western roads were coming
en masse to the eastern cities to raise money and if the funds were not forthcoming many lines so essential to the growth of the United States could not be built. For this reason Henry Poor, writing from his Wall Street office  tried to popularize  the railroad mortgage bond, the comparatively new financial instrument that was to finance the construction of the roads in the West and the South. He also analyzed conditions of the New York investment market, advising the roads when  to float their securities and explained to them the intricacies of getting  a fair price for western railroad bonds. Poor repeatedly advocated developing systems in  the methods of buying and selling securities. He urged reliable banking firms to enter the railroad security field.

By 1852, however, conditions had changed so rapidly that construction finance was no longer the major problem in the railroad industry and railroads were proliferating.  Poor became cautious and urged the investors not to put their money into roads about which they had little information, and asked the roads not to come to the market  unless the soundness of their financial position was made explicit in
their printed prospectuses. By 1857 there was depression and railroads got into financial problems. Poor
therefore turned his attention from finance and financial reform to the second major problem raised by the expansion of the railroad system at the time that of operation and management.

Railroads

The Erie Railroad was completed in 1851, the Baltimore and Ohio and the Atlantic and St. Lawrence in 1853, and the Pennsylvania in 1855. The year 1852 saw the entrance of the Michigan Central and the
Michigan Southern into Chicago, and by 1855 the Mississippi had been reached at several places. By that date the Old Northwest which in 1849 had only some 600 miles of road could boast that nearly every sizable town in the area had rail connections with the Atlantic seaboard.

The development and handling of through traffic became an important factor in the survival or success.
One result was the consolidation of smaller lines. The railroad entrepreneurs of the 1850's were now faced with the complex problem of how to operate it most effectively.

The most serious and most novel of the problems of operation were raised by the greatly increased size of the new operating units. By 1855 close to twenty operating units were working more than 250 miles of road.

This development of large individual operating units  presented the American businessmen for the first time with the many modern problems of large-scale business management. Daniel C. McCallum, superintendent of the Erie, pointed out that actually in management methods the smaller roads were closer to the small manufacturing firms of the day than to the new roads of the fifties. A Superintendent of a road fifty miles in length can give its business his personal attention and may be constantly on the line engaged in the direction of its details; each person is personally known to him, and all questions in relation to its business are at once presented and acted upon; and any system however imperfect may under such circumstances prove comparatively successful. In the government of a road five hundred miles in length a very different state exists.

Henry Poor quite agreed with McCallum that system rather than size determined the efficiency of a road, and therefore, its productiveness. His attention had been turned to the problems of large-scale management by the realization that many small roads, old and new, were making better net returns than the large new ones. In railroads, where profits were relatively low, Poor felt that the failure to systematize administration and operations, rather than the roads' traditional excuse of low rates, was most responsible for their unfavorable
financial record. In 1854,  Poor decided to turn the attention of his paper to the study of management.

He wrote "We believe that the science of management is the most important in its bearings upon the success of the American Railroads that it includes facts and principles which are deserving a full statement and an elaborate discussion. . . In this field the Journal will ever strive to be a faithful laborer. To the editor of the Journal the science of management fundamentally resolved itself into three principles organization, communication, and  information. Of these organization was basic."


Organization to Poor meant the careful division of labor, from the president to the common laborer,
with each man having his own specified duties and responsibilities, and each being directly accountable to his immediate superior.  By communication Poor meant primarily a method of reporting throughout the organization which would give the top management an accurate and continuous account of the progress of
operations, and which in so doing would assure the necessary accountability all along the line. Information in an administrative sense was to Poor recorded communications that is, a record of the operational reports systematically compiled and analyzed. This information was to be used for deriving a clearer understanding of such basic matters as fixed costs, running expenses, operational performance, rate-making, and so
forth, and also to provide data necessary for more scientific experimentation to improve service.

He was in touch with various managers of railways in various companies. He was closest to McCallum of the Erie.  "Mr. McCallum's strong point," wrote Poor, "lies in his power to  arrange and systematize, and in his ambitions to perfect his systems. To  this end he has untiringly devoted his energies since he was appointed
in charge of this great work."


McCallum had reorganized the service so as to eliminate much duplication of work and thereby had actually made the road more efficient by cutting down the number of paid hands. Further measures had been
to utilize men fully by making temporarily unoccupied men to clean machinery and make minor repairs
on the rolling stock and equipment. He had systematized the methods of  repairing locomotives so that more than forty engines which were normally lying idle could be on the road. More important was McCallum's
proficiency in adapting the telegraph to railroad operations. Not only did the telegraph make for safer and far more efficient operations but it was also used to facilitate over-all administration. Poor concluded his remarks on McCallum's initial reforms by pointing out that:  Now, the superintendent can tell at any hour of
the day, the precise location of every car and engine on the line of the road and the duty it is performing. Formerly, the utmost confusion prevailed in this regard,  so much so that cars in perfect order
have stood for months upon the switches without being put to the least service, and without its being known where they were.


McCallum's careful "division of  management" was best expressed in an organization chart of the Erie
which he had drawn up for purposes of reference. The design of the chart was a tree with the roots representing the President and the Board of Directors; the branches were the five operating divisions and the
service departments: engine repairs, car, bridge, telegraph, printing, and so on; while the leaves represented the various local agents, subordinate superintendents, train crews, foremen, and so forth. McCallum's
subdivision went even further than indicated on the chart. The smaller units such as the repair and machine shops were "managed with the same careful system that characterized the general superintendence of the
Company's affairs."  Within these subdivisions the duties of each grade in the hierarchy not only were carefully specified, but the grade of each individual in the organization was indicated on the prescribed uniform worn by all employees.

The line of command within the organization followed closely the lines indicated on the organization chart. Orders must go from roots to the leaves via the proper branches. "All subordinates," McCallum insisted,
"shall be accountable to and be directed by their own immediate superior only; an obedience can not be enforced where the foreman in immediate charge is interfered with by a superior officer giving orders directly to his subordinates."  In the same way McCallum pointed out when discussing the powers of the more senior officials, "their subordinates cannot  communicate with higher office, but through them [the senior officials]
and can only be communicated with through them."


Communication from subordinate to superior in  the Erie was achieved by a thoroughgoing system
of reports. "This plan involves on the one hand a very considerable trouble and expense," the Journal
admitted, including "the maintenance of a large office of eight active clerks, but on the other hand it depicts faithfully in the general office every fact of practical importance." This plan included hourly, daily,
and monthly reports. The hourly reports were mainly operational, giving by telegraph a train's location and the reasons for any delays or mishaps.  This "information being entered on a convenient tabular form, showed at a glance, the position and progress of the trains,  in both directions on every Division." It also provided an excellent source of operational information which among other things proved especially useful in deter-
mining and eliminating "causes of delays."

Daily reports, the real basis of the system were required from both conductors and station agents. They covered all important matters of train operations as well as the more general movement of freight and
passenger traffic.  Daily reports were required from the engineers also. These were compiled in a monthly statement giving for each engine the miles run, running expenses, cost of repairs, and work done, and were
submitted as part of the monthly report required of each division superintendent. The superintendent's reports included an account of all operations of the division including cost, expenses, work done for all types of
equipment. Similar monthly reports were required from the heads of all the service departments. The
information thus obtained is embodied in the statistical accounts kept in this office and from it one can  deduce" a mass of information useful in improving the effectiveness of operations.

To Henry Poor the recording and filing of the operational and administrative information in statistical form was as important an aspect of reporting plan as was its provision for communicating the progress of operations to the head office. Poor had long considered operating statistics the basic tool for scientific management, and McCallum's plan appeared to be the most effective one yet devised to acquire such data.


Intelligent action could be taken to reduce expenses and improve performance only when it was known what the expenses of a road were and just how equipment and personnel performed. Comparative studies of the monthly engine reports, for example, clearly showed what engines were best suited to the different tasks, which engineers operated their machines most efficiently, and where changes should be made.

Statistics so necessary in determining running expenses were also essential in ascertaining the specific cost of carrying the different classifications of freight traffic and in fixing a fair rate for each classification. Statistics, Poor insisted, were the only basis on which sound principles  of rate-making could be evolved. Unless rates were thus scientifically determined, unless running and fixed expenses were carefully understood,
no road could be sure just what its net receipts were or how its profits and loss really stood. These determinations, in turn, could not be made until a careful system of organization and communication was devised.

The directors of the railroads always demanded increasing rates to take care of increase in expenses of transportation.  Transportation is  essential to American economic development.  Henry Poor was against it. Instead of increasing the rates Poor urged the American railroad men to apply their minds to reducing expenses so that the apparently low fares could bring a profitable return. He insisted upon an economical administration of the roads. He wrote, "With such an administration we believe the usual rates of charges can be rendered sufficiently remunerative."

In calling on the roads to meet their financial problems by adopting more efficient and economical operating and administrative techniques rather than by raising rates, Poor was the first to voice a demand that
railroad  reformers would take up and carry on for decades to come. In Poor's own day such engineers as Charles Ellet, Jr., John B. Jervis, Daniel C. McCallum, and Zerah Colburn, all made extensive efforts in different fields of railroad operation to carry out principles of a more scientific management.  After
the Civil War their efforts were expanded and refined by the brilliant work of Charles Francis Adams, Albert Fink, and Marshall Kirkman.  Nevertheless, considerations other than improved management in-
fluenced the policies of the financially minded railroad executives of that  day and  too often innovations and improvements in management methods were ignored or laid aside. Thus even as late as 1910 Louis D. Brandeis, supported the views of many of the country's leading engineers (industrial or efficiency engineers) and F.W. Taylor, proponent of scientific management and  insisted that the railroads should meet their financial difficulties by improving their administrative and operational efficiency rather than by raising rates.

If Henry Poor's enunciation of the principles of a more scientific management the principles of systematic organization, communication, and information anticipated and indeed indicated the most constructive
nineteenth-century developments in big business organization, his understanding of the problems involved in putting these principles into practice foreshadowed the twentieth-century pragmatic analysis of big business
management.

He reaised the grave difficulties of adapting human capabilities and current business practices and institutions to the severe requirements demanded by the efficient operation of large-scale administrative units.

Of these difficulties one was the problem of getting railroad employees to accept the strict discipline and rigid regulations that were an essential part of large-scale administration. The employees took no pains to hide their dislike of the new model management and resorted to strikes.The tightening of control was also a primary cause for the founding in 1855 of the National Protective Association of the Locomotive Engineers of the United States. The call for the Association's first regular meeting registered a strong protest against "the blind system requiring implicit obedience" to all rules and regulations and asked: shall we longer submit to the tyrannical will of a few men who strive to aggrandize themselves and build themselves up the title of "Napoleons" and "Able Managers" by grinding down the pay and trying to suppress our rights as a free and independent class of men for the purpose of adding to their already enormous salaries for their "Able Management"?

Henry Poor  felt strongly that the new rules and regulations must be faithfully followed, for "we can see no other way in which such a vast machine can be safely and successfully conducted." Nevertheless he
stressed that the engineers had a valid point and urged that the regulations be given flexibility and that discretion within certain limits be allowed. He warned railroad managers of the danger of "regarding man as a mere machine, out of which all the qualities necessary to be a good servant can be enforced by the payment of wages. Duties cannot be always prescribed and the most valuable ones are often voluntary ones. . ."

 Poor highlighted the deadening effect of fixed wages and prescribed duties on the initiative and interest of the men in the organization.  Thus with salaries determined by grade rather than by ability shown or work accomplished and with the functions of each grade specifically prescribed, Poor saw little reason for the railroad employee or official to exert himself to improve the company's service.

 There is one way in which it can, and that is to supply an adequate motive to good conduct, by rewarding merit at its worth. Till this is done, railroads, wherever they may be, will drag along in their beaten tracks of dullness and routine, and become worse managed and less productive year by year.

Poor admitted, however, that the tendency toward routine and dullness was not inevitable as long as top management provided genuine leadership. Leadership infused an esprit de corps into the organization,
which stirred the interest and initiative of subordinate officials and made strict regulation more acceptable to the employees.  At the same time leadership was essential to keep the organization operating as a single
unit. The minds of the top management, wrote Poor, must become the soul of the enterprise, reaching and infusing life, intelligence and obedience into every portion of it. This soul must not be a fragmentary or
disjointed one giving one direction to the head, another to the hands, and another to the feet. Wherever there is a lack of unity there will be a lack of energy of intelligence of life of accountability and subordination.

Such leadership, however, demands the highest talents. Not only must the top managers know how to handle men, but they must, in Poor's view, have an expert knowledge and training in all aspects of railroad
administration and operation. Yet this was rarely the case in American companies, for, as Poor wrote, railroad executives and superintendents, while understanding their own specific duties, too often were
unacquainted with those of every important department under them; there is consequently no connecting link between the different departments of service, and no intelligence to guide them to a common end. In such a case it will not be long before the morale necessary to a high state of discipline will be completely broken. Instead of a unit, the different departments of service will often be arranged in hostile attitude towards each other. Parties in influential positions, being left to themselves, soon come to regard their own interests as the
chief objects of concern.

A superior could hardly be expected to exact accountability down the line if he did not comprehend the type of work being accounted for. Nor could he make use of a carefully systematized supply of hourly,
daily and monthly reports if he were not competent to interpret and understand the data he received. His subordinates finding it unnecessary, indeed often useless, to make reports and rarely receiving explicit orders were soon carrying out their own work without supervision from above. The ultimate result was that the railroad was administered from the bottom rather than the top. If the American railroads were, therefore, to operate efficiently it was  obvious that they must be managed by men of the highest ability and
training in railroad management. Yet it was just as obvious that this was rarely the case. In trying to account for this deficiency, Poor suggested that, in the first place, railroad companies did not provide incentives
enough to attract and hold the most able men; and, secondly, they too often used other criteria than ability and training in the selection of men for the top managerial posts. Finally, railroad companies too often failed
to detect inadequate leadership within their organization. This blindness Poor blamed primarily on the inability of the roads to exact proper accountability and responsibility from their managers. The breakdown of
managerial leadership in Poor's view, was, thus, not so much the inability of human capabilities to meet the multitudinous responsibilities of top management; it was rather the failure of current business methods and
organization to meet the requirements of large-scale administration. And this organizational failure was, in Poor's mind, sharply intensified by the sudden rise of a new business phenomenon the separation of ownership and management within the railroad corporation.

By the end of the 1850's the editor of the Railroad Journal was tracing nearly all the problems of railroads to the one underlying fact that their managers did not own and their owners did not manage. The complex
requirements of large-scale railroad operation necessitating as they did, for the first time in American business, the development of a technically proficient administrative hierarchy had created a managerial class. The huge financial demands of railroad construction and operation, on the other hand, requiring a vast amount of capital from private individuals, had created an investor class and had spread ownership among a large number of persons many of whom lived at great distances from each other and from their property. Henry Poor was uncertain whether the resulting division of the business unit between management and ownership could be resolved within the accepted framework of the corporation.


To be modified once again.

Published 18 Sep 2015















Sociotechnical Systems Approach - Management Thought Development Approach


Based on the premise that technical system has a great effect on social system (personal attitudes and group behavior)

 The term socio-technical system was coined in the 1960s by Eric Trist and Fred Emery who were working as consultants at the Tavistock Institute in London.


Based on
Socio-technical systems: From design methods to systems engineering
Gordon Baxter⁎ and Ian Sommerville
Interacting with Computers Volume 23, Issue 1, 2011, Pp. 4-17.
http://iwc.oxfordjournals.org/content/23/1/4.full

The term socio-technical systems was originally coined by Emery and Trist (1960) to describe systems that involve a complex interaction between humans, machines and the environmental aspects of the work system—nowadays, this interaction is true of most enterprise systems. The corollary of this definition is that all of these factors—people, machines and context—need to be considered when developing such systems using STSD methods.  STSD methods mostly provide advice for sympathetic systems designers rather than detailed notations and a process that should be followed.

There are five key characteristics of open socio-technical systems (Badham et al., 2000):

Systems should have interdependent parts.

Systems should adapt to and pursue goals in external environments.

Systems have an internal environment comprising separate but interdependent technical and social subsystems.

Systems have equifinality. In other words, systems goals can be achieved by more than one means. This implies that there are design choices to be made during system development.

System performance relies on the joint optimisation of the technical and social subsystems. Focusing on one of these systems to the exclusion of the other is likely to lead to degraded system performance and utility.

STSD methods were developed to facilitate the design of such systems.


Mumford (2006) provides an historical overview of developments in STSD. The general aim was to investigate the organisation of work, with early work in STSD focused mostly on manufacturing and production industries such as coal, textiles, and petrochemicals. The aim was to see whether work in these industries could be made more humanistic. In other words, the intention was to move away from the mechanistic view of work encompassed by Taylor’s (1911) principles of scientific management, which largely relied on the specialisation of work and the division of labour.

The heyday of STSD was, perhaps, the 1970s and the early part of the 1980s.  The XSEL (eXpert SELler) system of the Digital Equipment Corporation (DEC) was developed using STSD (see Mumford and MacDonald, 1989 for a retrospective view). It was an expert system designed to help DEC sales staff assist customers in properly configuring their VAX computer installations. This system was a success and at its peak the family of expert systems, including XSEL, that were being used to support configuration and location of DEC-VAX computers was claimed to be saving the company tens of millions of dollars a year (Barker and O’Connor, 1989). The example illustrates that socio-technical approaches can be used effectively in real systems engineering.

 The late 1980s and early 1990s also saw the emergence of ethnographic studies of work, stimulated by Suchman’s (1987) seminal research at Xerox PARC. These ethnographic approaches (e.g., Heath and Luff, 1991) highlighted the significance of socio-technical issues in the design of software-intensive systems (e.g., Blomberg, 1988).

The 21st century has seen a revival of interest in socio-technical approaches.  The ideas appear in areas such as participatory design methods, CSCW and ethnographic approaches to design. Indeed, one of the key tenets of STSD is a focus on participatory methods, where end users are involved during the design process (e.g., Greenbaum and Kyng, 1991). However, these methods, all of which have their roots in STSD, differ in important respects. Participatory design, which covers a whole range of methods (e.g., see Muller et al., 1993), often involves the users (or user representatives) effectively moving into the territory of the system developers for the duration of the project. By contrast, empathic design (Leonard and Rayport, 1997) and contextual design (e.g., Beyer and Holtzblatt, 1999), which reflect STSD ideas, adopt the inverse view and put the developers into the users’ world as part of the development process.

The field of CSCW came about partly in response to a need to discuss the development of group support applications (Grudin, 1994), but it has implicit roots in socio-technical thinking. Bowker et al. (1997) make the link explicit, dealing with the socio-technical system and CSCW, as does the recent special issue of the journal Computer-Supported Cooperative Work which deals with CSCW and dependability in health care systems (Procter et al., 2006). The field of dependability (Laprie, 1985; Avizienis et al., 2004) is also intrinsically concerned with socio-technical systems, although this field sometimes uses the term ‘computer-based systems’ to refer to socio-technical systems.

Socio-technical ideas are equally applicable in other settings where technology is deployed. In recent years, there has been an increasing uptake of technology in the home, particularly as smart home technologies and assistive technologies.  Sommerville and Dewsbury (2007), for example, developed a model for the design of dependable domestic systems, which adopts a socio-technical view in which the system comprises the user, the home environment, and the installed technology.





http://cptransform.wordpress.com/2011/02/10/sociotechnicalsystem/


Philosophy of Socio Technical Systems
http://scholar.lib.vt.edu/ejournals/SPT/v4_n3html/ROPOHL.html

Reviewed Work: Management of Work: A Socio-Technical System Approach by Thomas G. Cummings, Suresh Srivasta
Review by: Fremont Shull
The Academy of Management Review
Vol. 2, No. 4 (Oct., 1977), pp. 700-703

The Management of Socio-technical Systems using Configuration Modelling
Simon Lock
http://www.dirc.org.uk/publications/articles/papers/57.pdf


Sociotechnical Management Model for
Governance of an Ecosystem
Antonio J. Balloni1
, Adalberto Mantovani Martiniano de Azevedo2
 and Marco
Antonio Silveira
International Journal of Managing Information Technology (IJMIT) Vol.4, No.3, August 2012
http://airccse.org/journal/ijmit/papers/4312ijmit01.pdf


Updated  18 Sep 2015,  13 May 2014

Sunday, September 13, 2015

Karl Ludwig von Bertalanffy - Biography - Contribution



Karl Ludwig von Bertalanffy (September 19, 1901 – June 12, 1972) was an Austrian-born biologist known as one of the founders of general systems theory (GST).

GST is an interdisciplinary practice that describes systems with interacting components, applicable to biology, cybernetics, and other fields.

General system theory
The theory attempted to provide alternatives to conventional models of organization. GST defined new foundations and developments as a generalized theory of systems with applications to numerous areas of study, emphasizing holism over reductionism, organism over mechanism.

Foundational to GST are the inter-relationships between elements which all together form the whole.

Open systems
Bertalanffy's contribution to systems theory is best known for his theory of open systems. The system theorist argued that traditional closed system models based on classical science and the second law of thermodynamics were inadequate for explaining large classes of phenomena. Bertalanffy maintained that “the conventional formulation of physics are, in principle, inapplicable to the living organism being open system having steady state.

In Bertalanffy’s model, the theorist defined general principles of open systems and the limitations of conventional models. Concerning biology, examples from the open systems view suggested they “may suffice to indicate briefly the large fields of application” that could be the “outlines of a wider generalization;” He developed implications for cybernetics also. Bertalanffy also noted unsolved problems.

Systems in the social sciences

In the social sciences, Bertalanffy did believe that general systems concepts were applicable, e.g. theories that had been introduced into the field of sociology from a modern systems approach that included “the concept of general system, of feedback, information, communication, etc.” He  critiqued classical “atomistic” conceptions of social systems and ideation “such as ‘social physics’ as was often attempted in a reductionist spirit.”  The theory  encouraged for new developments from sociology, to anthropology, economics, political science, and psychology among other areas.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ludwig_von_Bertalanffy

http://www.isss.org/lumLVB.htm

Very detailed paper on General System Theory  http://www.mind-development.eu/systems.html

Systems Approach in Management

Prof A.D. Chandler - Biography - Contribution

Alfred DuPont Chandler, Jr. (September 15, 1918 – May 9, 2007) was a professor of business history at Harvard Business School. His research area was  the scale and the management structures of modern corporations. His works redefined business and economic history of industrialization. He received the Pulitzer Prize for History for his work, The Visible Hand: The Managerial Revolution in American Business (1977).

Chandler graduated from Harvard College in 1940. After World War II, he returned to Harvard, finished his M.A. in 1946, and earned his doctorate in 1952 under the direction of Frederick Merk. He taught at M.I.T. and Johns Hopkins University before joining Harvard Business School in 1970.


Chandler used the papers of his ancestor Henry Varnum Poor, a leading analyst of the railway industry, the publisher of the American Railroad Journal, and a founder of Standard & Poor's, for his Ph.D. thesis.

His book Strategy and Structure: Chapters in the History of the Industrial Enterprise (1962) examined the organization of E.I. du Pont de Nemours and Company, Standard Oil of New Jersey, General Motors, and Sears, Roebuck and Co.  The book was voted the eleventh most influential management book of the 20th century in a poll of the Fellows of the Academy of Management.

This emphasis on the importance of a cadre of managers to organize and run large-scale corporations was explained in more detail in  "The Visible Hand: The Managerial Revolution in American Business (1977)" for which he received a Pulitzer Prize. He pursued the research  further and published "Scale and Scope: The Dynamics of Industrial Capitalism, (1990)" and co-edited an anthology  with Franco Amatori and Takashi Hikino, "Big Business and the Wealth of Nations (1997)."

Chandler continued to do research and write until the very end of his life. In 2001, he wrote “Inventing the Electronic Century: The Epic Story of the Consumer Electronics and Computer Industry,” which focused on the fall of the Radio Corporation of America (RCA) and the rise of Sony and Matsushita, as Japan conquered the worldwide consumer electronics market. That volume was followed in 2005 by “Shaping the Industrial Century: The Remarkable Story of the Evolution of the Modern Chemical and Pharmaceutical Industries.”

Management for Chandler was much more than the CEO, it was the whole system of techniques and included middle management  as well as the corporate structure of the biggest firms, Standard Oil, General Electric, US Steel, and DuPont. Chandler argued that managerial firms evolved in order to take advantage of productive techniques available after the rail network was in place. These firms had a higher productivity and lower costs resulting in higher profits. The firms created the "managerial class" in America because they needed to coordinate the increasingly complex and interdependent system.


According to Chandler, during the 19th century, the development of new systems based on steam power and electricity created a Second Industrial Revolution, which resulted in much more capital-intensive industries than had the industrial revolution of the previous century. The mobilization of the capital necessary to exploit these new systems required a larger number of workers and managers, and larger physical plants than ever before. More particularly, the thesis of The Visible Hand is that,  administrative structure and managerial coordination replaced Adam Smith's "invisible hand" (market forces) among perfectly competitive market system with large number of sellers and buyers as the core developmental and structuring impetus of modern business.

In the wake of this increase of industrial scale, three successful models of capitalism emerged, which Chandler associated with the three leading countries of the period: Great Britain ("personal capitalism"), the United States ("competitive capitalism") and Germany ("cooperative capitalism.")


Along with economist Oliver E. Williamson and historians Louis Galambos, Robert H. Wiebe, and Thomas C. Cochran, Chandler was a leading historian of the organizational synthesis.



Chandler is also credited with the foundational role in introducing and popularizing the concept of business strategy.

In sociology, prior to Chandler's research, some sociologists assumed there were no differences between governmental, corporate, and nonprofit organizations. Chandler's work on corporations clearly demonstrated that there were differences, and this thesis has influenced organizational sociologists' work since the late 1970s.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alfred_D._Chandler,_Jr.
http://news.harvard.edu/gazette/story/2007/05/hbs-professor-alfred-chandler-jr-pre-eminent-business-historian-dead-at-88/
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/05/12/business/12chandler.html?_r=0

Saturday, September 12, 2015

Henri Fayol - Biography and Contribution

Date of Birth  29 July 1841

Henri Fayol was born in 1841 of a family of businessmen. At the age of 19, he graduated as a mining engineer. He got job as engineer in the Commentry groups of pits of the Commentry-Fourechambault Company in 1860. He remained with this company throughout his long and distinguished business career. He became its Managing Director and retired from the position in 1918.


His first address on administration was delivered on 23 June 1900.

He gave a second lecture on administration in 1908 in the Silver Jubilee Congress of the Societe de l'Industrie Minerale.

His famous work "Admininistration Industrielle et generale" was published in a bulletin in 1916.

Tuesday, May 5, 2015

Benjamin Graham - Biography and Contribution

Benjamin Graham (Birthday: May 8, 1894) was a British-born American stock market professional,  teacher of stock market investment theory and author of famous books on stock market investment.  Graham is considered the father of value investing, an investment approach he began teaching at Columbia Business School in 1928. His book with  David Dodd had several editions and explained Security Analysis of both equity and debt securities in detail. Graham's students went on to become successful investors. Graham's most well-known disciples include Warren Buffett, William J. Ruane, Irving Kahn and Walter J. Schloss, among others. Buffett credits Graham as grounding him with a sound intellectual investment framework and described him as the second most influential person in his life after his own father. In fact, Graham had such an overwhelming influence on his students that two of them, Buffett and Kahn, named their sons Howard Graham Buffett and Thomas Graham Kahn after him.

Benjamin Graham was born Benjamin Grossbaum in London, England,to Jewish parents. He moved to New York City with his family when he was one year old. He graduated from Columbia University. He took a job on Wall Street and in due course started the Graham-Newman Partnership, an investment firm. He started teaching Security Analysis in the evenings in 1928.

His book, Security Analysis, with David Dodd, was published in 1934. He published "The Intelligent Investor"  in 1949. Both books had further revisions. Both are famous books and are essential reading for serious investors.   Warren Buffett describes The Intelligent Investor as "the best book about investing ever written." Graham's most famous student is Warren Buffett.



Interesting Articles About Graham's Investment Approach and Philosophy by Narayana Rao K.V.S.S.


1.  Fundamental Analysis – Graham–Rao Method

2. Graham-Rao Method

3. Fundamental Analysis -Topic 1 Graham Rao Method  - The article has links to Google Docs


Monday, May 4, 2015

Jerry A. Hausman - Biography and Contribution



Jerry Allen Hausman (birthday: May 5, 1946) is the John and Jennie S. MacDonald Professor of Economics at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

He is one of the developers of  the Durbin-Wu-Hausman test,

His recent applied papers are on topics including the effect of new goods on economic welfare and their measurement in the CPI, new telecommunications technologies including cellular 3G and broadband, regulation of telecommunications and railroads, and competition in network markets.


https://www.aeaweb.org/honors_awards/bios/Jerry_Hausman.php

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jerry_A._Hausman

Saturday, April 18, 2015

Fredirick Herzberg - Biography and Contribution - Two Factor Theory of Motivation



Frederick Irving Herzberg (April 18, 1923 – January 19, 2000 is  an American psychologist who conributed to management theory in business management. He is most famous for introducing the concept of  job enrichment and the Motivator-Hygiene theory. His 1968 publication "One More Time, How Do You Motivate Employees?" had sold 1.2 million reprints by 1987 and was the most requested article from the Harvard Business Review. This article explain how to do job enrichment. It describes horizontal loading and vertical loading of jobs.



He graduated from the City College of New York in 1946. He then joined University of Pittsburgh and took a master's degree in science and public health. His  Ph.D. research  focused on electric shock therapy.

Herzberg worked at the University of Utah, until he retirement. Prior to the  move to Utah, Herzberg was professor of management at Case Western Reserve University where he established the Department of Industrial Mental Health.

In his lifetime, Herzberg had consulted for many organisations as well as for the United States and other foreign governments.

Motivator-Hygiene Theory

According to the motivator-hygiene theory ( two-factor theory, of job satisfaction)  hygiene factors will not motivate, but if they are not there, they can lower motivation.



Motivational factors are responsible for increasing motivation if they are present in the job situation. These factors include job recognition, potential for promotion and satisfaction derived from the work itself.


http://www.lib.uwo.ca/programs/generalbusiness/herzberg.html

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frederick_Herzberg

Saturday, April 4, 2015

LOGISTICS AND SCM – THE NEXT DECADE - Conference, 24 - 25 September 2015 - Hamburg


https://hicl.org/

LOGISTICS AND SCM – THE NEXT DECADE

Dates
24 September 2015 Conference Day One
25 September 2015 Conference Day Two
10 April 2015 Abstract Submission Deadline
24 April 2015 Abstract - Notification of acceptance
26 June 2015 Paper Submission Closes
10 July 2015 Paper - Notification of Acceptance
24 July 2015 Author Conference Registration Deadline
22 September 2015 Guest Registration Deadline


The 10th anniversary of the Hamburg International Conference of Logistics 2015 (HICL).

TUHH invites you to participate in this respected conference at the Hamburg University of Technology (TUHH) on 24 & 25 September 2015.

10 years since the first HICL, 10 years that changed the business environment immensely: Customers are demanding more innovative, more diverse and greener products at a competitive rate. This creates numerous challenges for all players in the supply chain; yet it also is presents a chance for companies to further flourish in their strive for excellence. Heading into the next decade, the anniversary event of the HICL focuses on research concepts and ideas in Logistics and Supply Chain Management that take learnings from the past and address todays and future challenge.


Call for Papers

https://hicl.org/call




Supply Chain Management - Research Papers 2014

https://hicl.org/books

BOOKS
2014
Meyer-Larsen N, Hauge JBaalsrud, Müller R, Hamadache K, Aifadopoulou G, Forcolin M, Roso V, Tsoukos G, Westerheim H.  2014.  Accelerating the Innovation Uptake in Logistics. Innovative Methods in Logistics and Supply Chain Management.  (547.11 KB)

De Langhe K.  2014.  Analysing the Role of Rail in Urban Freight Distribution. Next Generation Supply Chains.  (1.31 MB)

Ridwan A, Noche B.  2014.  Analyzing Process Capability Indices (PCI) and Cost of Poor Quality (COPQ) to Improve Performance of Supply Chain. Innovative Methods in Logistics and Supply Chain Management.  (719.52 KB)

Herlyn W.  2014.  The Bullwhip Effect in Expanded Supply Chains and the Concept of Cumulative Quantities. Innovative Methods in Logistics and Supply Chain Management.  (2.14 MB)

Mathieu H, Colin J-Y, Nakechbandi M.  2014.  Computing Dynamic Routes in Maritime Logistic Networks. Innovative Methods in Logistics and Supply Chain Management.  (632.17 KB)

https://hicl.org/books

Veenstra A, Hulstijn J, Griffioen P.  2014.  Control and Monitoring in International Logistics Chains. Innovative Methods in Logistics and Supply Chain Management.  (753.67 KB)

Jahn C, Schlingmeier J, Blecker T, Kersten W, Ringle CM.  2014.  Cooperation in Empty Container Logistics. Innovative Methods in Logistics and Supply Chain Management.  (740.45 KB)

Jepsen LBroede.  2014.  Critical Success Factors for Horizontal Logistics Collaboration. Innovative Methods in Logistics and Supply Chain Management.  (612.88 KB)

Gross W, Butz C.  2014.  Design of Sustainable Transportation Networks. Next Generation Supply Chains.  (922.63 KB)

Kaurić AGrilec, Miočević D, Mikulić J.  2014.  Dynamic Capabilities and Firm Effectiveness: The Mediating Role of Supply Chain Performance. Innovative Methods in Logistics and Supply Chain Management.  (693.76 KB)

https://hicl.org/books

Fandl RChristian, Held T.  2014.  Early Supplier Integration in Cast Product Development Partnerships – A Multiple Case Study of Environmental and Cost Effects in the German Foundry Value Chain. Next Generation Supply Chains.  (782.22 KB)

Boutselis P, McNaught K.  2014.  Finite-Time Horizon Logistics Decision Making Problems: Consideration of a Wider Set of Factors. Innovative Methods in Logistics and Supply Chain Management.  (652.87 KB)

Fan Y, Schwartz F, Voß S.  2014.  Flexible Supply Chain Design under Stochastic Catastrophic Risks. Next Generation Supply Chains.  (1.27 MB)

Saikouk T, Badraoui I, Spalanzani A.  2014.  The Forest Supply Chain Management: An Entropic Perspective. Next Generation Supply Chains.  (1.11 MB)

Linkosaari T.  2014.  A Functional Mathematical Optimization Algorithm for the Integration of the Tactical Berth, Crane and Vehicle Scheduling. Innovative Methods in Logistics and Supply Chain Management.  (729.36 KB)

https://hicl.org/books

Klumpp M, Bioly S, Witte C.  2014.  Future Problems in Logistics Due to Demographic Change. Next Generation Supply Chains.  (946.39 KB)

Kalogerakis K, Wagenstetter N.  2014.  A General Framework for Open Service Innovation in Logistics. Innovative Methods in Logistics and Supply Chain Management.  (623.02 KB)

Bashiri M, Chehrepak E, Gomari S.  2014.  Gradual Covering Location Problem with Stochastic Radius. Innovative Methods in Logistics and Supply Chain Management.  (816.94 KB)

Herold DM, Wilde S, Wojtarowicz N.  2014.  How to Attract Air Freight Business: Defining Critical Success Factors for Regional Airports. Next Generation Supply Chains.  (578.68 KB)

Zitzmann I.  2014.  How to Cope with Uncertainty in Supply Chains? - Conceptual Framework for Agility, Robustness, Resilience, Continuity and Anti-Fragility in Supply Chains Next Generation Supply Chains.  (647.18 KB)

https://hicl.org/books

Zuber C, Pfohl H-C, Berbner U.  2014.  The Imbalance of Supply Risk and Risk Management Activities in Supply Chains: Developing Metrics to Enable Network Analysis in the Context of Supply Chain Risk Management. Next Generation Supply Chains.  (1.23 MB)

Idris F, Mohammad J.  2014.  The Impacts of Team Management on Customer Service: The Mediating Role of Operation Flexibility. Innovative Methods in Logistics and Supply Chain Management.  (729.75 KB)

Kellberger S.  2014.  Information Flow Analysis of the Container Discharging Process. Innovative Methods in Logistics and Supply Chain Management.  (1.65 MB)

Maric J, Rodhain F, Barlette Y.  2014.  Information Systems and Reverse Logistics: Examining Drivers of Implementation on Multiple Case Study Scenario. Next Generation Supply Chains.  (749.32 KB)
Thorsten Blecker, Wolfgang Kersten, Christian M. Ringle.  2014.  Innovative Methods in Logistics and Supply Chain Management.  (11.42 MB)

https://hicl.org/books


Gries S, Witte C, Föhring R, Zelewski S.  2014.  Investments in Electro Mobility for Freight Traffics in the Field of City Logistics: A Profitability Analysis. Innovative Methods in Logistics and Supply Chain Management.  (557.45 KB)
Hintsa J, Mohanty S.  2014.  A Literature-Based Qualitative Framework for Assessment of Socio-Economic Negative Impacts of Common Illicit Cross-border Freight Logistics Flows. Innovative Methods in Logistics and Supply Chain Management.  (650.93 KB)
Cagliano ACorinna, Mustafa MSalman, Rafele C, Zenezini G.  2014.  Logistics Performance Measurement for Sustainability in the Fast Fashion Industry. Next Generation Supply Chains.  (985.64 KB)
Zelewski S, Münchow-Küster A, Föhring R.  2014.  Logistics Trends 2020: A National Delphi Study Concerning the German Logistics Sector. Next Generation Supply Chains.  (591.95 KB)
Saikouk T, Badraoui I.  2014.  Managing Common Goods in Supply Chain: Case of Agricultural Cooperatives. Innovative Methods in Logistics and Supply Chain Management.  (592.75 KB)

https://hicl.org/books

Ye NYing, Lau KHung.  2014.  Managing Demand and Supply Networks of the Chinese Fashion Apparel Industry under the Complexity of the New Economy Transition. Innovative Methods in Logistics and Supply Chain Management.  (1.29 MB)
Bancroft J.  2014.  Is Money Really Green? - An Investigation Into Environmental Supply Chain Practices, with a Cost Focus Next Generation Supply Chains.  (636.92 KB)
Bearzotti L, Gonzalez R.  2014.  A Multi-Agent Based Approach for Risk Management in a Port Container Terminal. Next Generation Supply Chains.  (535.89 KB)
Hintsa J, Mohanty S.  2014.  A New Research Protocol to Develop Multiple Case Studies on Illicit Activities in Trade, Logistics, Processing and Disposal of WEEE - Waste in Electrical and Electronic Equipment. Innovative Methods in Logistics and Supply Chain Management.  (135.66 KB)
Wolfgang Kersten, Thorsten Blecker, Christian M. Ringle.  2014.  Next Generation Supply Chains. Trends and Opportunities.  (9.46 MB)


https://hicl.org/books

Sprenger P, Parlings M, Hegmanns T.  2014.  Planning Approach for Robust Manufacturing Footprint Decisions. Next Generation Supply Chains.  (1018.12 KB)
Takahashi K, Kasugai Y, Fukuda I.  2014.  Powerful Leadership of National Government in Port Policy. Innovative Methods in Logistics and Supply Chain Management.  (1.16 MB)
Chebolu-Subramanian V, Gaukler G.  2014.  Product Recalls in the Meat and Poultry Industry: Key Drivers of Supply Chain Efficiency and Effectiveness. Innovative Methods in Logistics and Supply Chain Management.  (633.82 KB)
Klumpp M, Naskrent J, Hohl NAD.  2014.  Relevant Purchase Criteria or Basic Requirement: Customer Perspectives on Green Logistics. Next Generation Supply Chains.  (743.99 KB)
Jittamai P, Boonyanusith W.  2014.  Risk Assessment in Managing the Blood Supply Chain. Next Generation Supply Chains.  (734.85 KB)

https://hicl.org/books

Filla P, Klingebiel K.  2014.  A Risk Management Approach for the Pre-Series Logistics in Production Ramp-Up. Next Generation Supply Chains.  (326.08 KB)

Großmann A-M, von Gruben P.  2014.  The Role of Company Standards in Supply Chains – The Case of the German Automotive Industry. Innovative Methods in Logistics and Supply Chain Management.  (796.09 KB)

Cao NVi, Fragniere E.  2014.  A Service Production Planning Model Integrating Human Risk Factors. Next Generation Supply Chains.  (731.9 KB)

Güller M, Hegmanns T, Henke M, Straub N.  2014.  A Simulation-Based Decision Making Framework for the Anticipatory Change Planning of Intralogistics Systems. Innovative Methods in Logistics and Supply Chain Management.  (1.68 MB)

Schroeder M, Gomes RBarata.  2014.  Supply Chain Risk Management in International Trade Operations Between Germany and Brazil. Next Generation Supply Chains.  (533.44 KB)

https://hicl.org/books

Jażdżewska-Gutta M, Blecker T, Kersten W, Ringle CM.  2014.  Supply Chain Security Measures - The Business Perspective. Innovative Methods in Logistics and Supply Chain Management.  (617.14 KB)
Kronbak J, Münch A, Jiang L, de Jepsen LBrø.  2014.  Sustainable Logistic Scenarios in the NSR Region. Next Generation Supply Chains.  (590.92 KB)

Schweiger J.  2014.  A Theory-Based Perspective on Maturity Models in Purchasing and Supply Management. Innovative Methods in Logistics and Supply Chain Management.  (853.67 KB)
Hackius N, Kersten W.  2014.  Truck Loading Dock Process – Investigating Integration of Sustainability. Next Generation Supply Chains.  (558.27 KB)

Böse JW, Jahn C, Sarin R.  2014.  Vision of a Service Value Network in Maritime Container Logistics. Next Generation Supply Chains.  (1.1 MB)

Akbib M, Baida O, Lyhyaoui A, Amrani AGhacham, Sedqui A.  2014.  Workshop Layout by the Method of Vote and Comparison to the Average Ranks Method. Innovative Methods in Logistics and Supply Chain Management.  (2.92 MB)

https://hicl.org/books



Hamburg International Conference of Logistics
24 - 25 Sept 2015 Hamburg, Germany
https://hicl.org/


Friday, April 3, 2015

Reasons for the Low Usage of Scheduling Software - Research Study - Sandra Yveborg



Reasons for the Low Usage of Scheduling Software and the Difference in Production Performance Between Users and Nonusers of Scheduling Software from a Lean Manufacturing Perspective

Front Cover
Sandra Yveborg
ProQuest, 2008 - 153 pages



In the research, it was also found that companies using scheduling software have higher utilization rates of equipment, shorter lead times for paper storage, and a higher percentage of short makereadies out of the total number of makreadies. Nonusers of scheduling software have shorter throughput time and shorter waiting time for a job between preflighting and platemaking, between platemaking and plate mounting, and between completed printing and the first postpress operation. In general, the scheduling software users in the study are more homogeneous as a group in performance, whereas the nonusers are more diverse in performance, with a relatively high percentage performing at a very low or very high level.

https://books.google.co.in/books?id=opMBJrq_QMIC

Saturday, March 28, 2015

Economics of Asset Pricing - Research Papers 2015




Asset Pricing Theory (G1)


Presiding: JESSICA WACHTER (University of Pennsylvania)

Leisure Preferences, Long-Run Risks, and Human Capital Returns
ROBERT DITTMAR (University of Michigan)
FRANCISCO PALOMINO (University of Michigan)
WEI YANG (University of Indiana)
[View Abstract] [Download Preview]

New Entropy Restrictions and the Quest for Better Specified Asset Pricing Models
GURDIP BAKSHI (University of Maryland)
FOUSSENI CHABI-YO (Ohio State University)
[View Abstract] [Download Preview]

Asset Prices and Business Cycles with Financial Shocks
MAHDI NEZAFAT (Michigan State University)
CTIRAD SLAVIK (Goethe University Frankfurt)
[View Abstract]
Discussants:
STIJN VAN NIEUWERBURGH (New York University)
ADRIEN VERDELHAN (Massachusetts Institute of Technology)
ZHIGUO HE (University of Chicago)


Topics in Asset Pricing (G1)

Presiding: ROBERT HODRICK (Columbia University)

Quality Minus Junk
CLIFF ASNESS (AQR Capital)
ANDREA FRAZZINI (AQR Capital)
LASSE PEDERSEN (Copenhagen Business School)
[View Abstract] [Download Preview]

Stock Market Valuations Across U.S. States
GEERT BEKAERT (Columbia University)
CAMPBELL R. HARVEY (Duke University)
CHRISTIAN LUNDBLAD (University of North Carolina)
STEPHAN SIEGEL (University of Washington)
[View Abstract]

Horizon Effects in Average Returns: The Role of Slow Information Diffusion
OLIVER BOGUTH (Arizona State University)
MURRAY CARLSON (University of British Columbia)
ADLAI FISHER (University of British Columbia)
MIKHAIL SIMUTIN (University of Toronto)
[View Abstract] [Download Preview]

Option-Based Estimation of Co-Skewness and Co-Kurtosis Risk Premia
KRIS JACOBS (University of Houston)
PETER CHRISTOFFERSEN (University of Toronto)
MEHDI KAROUI (OMERS)
MATHIEU FOURNIER (HEC Montreal)
[View Abstract] [Download Preview]
Discussants:
JULES VAN BINSBERGEN (Stanford University)
RALPH KOIJEN (London Business School)
ZHONJIN LU (University of Georgia)
XIAOYAN ZHANG (Purdue University)


Asset Pricing under Heterogeneous Beliefs (G1)

Presiding: SULEYMAN BASAK (London Business School)

Value or Growth? Pricing of Idiosyncratic Cash Flow Risk with Heterogeneous Beliefs
HOGYU JHANG (Texas A&M University)
HWAGYUN KIM (Texas A&M University)
MICHAEL GALLMEYER (University of Virginia)
[View Abstract] [Download Preview]

Asset Prices and Portfolio Choice with Learning from Experience
PAUL EHLING (BI Norwegian Business School)
ALESSANDRO GRANIERO (London Business School)
CHRISTIAN HEYERDAHL-LARSEN (London Business School)
[View Abstract] [Download Preview]

Dynamic Equilibrium with Rare Events and Heterogeneous Epstein-Zin Investors
GEORGY CHABAKAURI (London School of Economics)
[View Abstract]

Dynamic Noisy Rational Expectations Equilibria with Anticipative Information
JEROME DETEMPLE (Boston University)
MARCEL RINDISBACHER (Boston University)
THU TRUONG (Boston University)
[View Abstract] [Download Preview]
Discussants:
HONGJUN YAN (Yale University)
NICOLAE GARLEANU (University of California-Berkeley)
ILARIA PIATTI (University of Oxford)
BRETT GREEN (University of California-Berkeley)


Empirical Asset Pricing: Long Run Risk and Funding Risk (G1)


Presiding: PIETRO VERONESI (University of Chicago)

Business-Cycle Consumption Risk and Asset Prices
FEDERICO BANDI (Johns Hopkins University)
ANDREA TAMONI (London School of Economics)
[View Abstract] [Download Preview]

Short-Run and Long-Run Consumption Risks, Dividend Processes and Asset Returns
JUN LI (University of Texas-Dallas)
HAROLD ZHANG (University of Texas-Dallas)
[View Abstract] [Download Preview]

Monetary Policy Risks in the Bond Markets and Macroeconomy
IVAN SHALIASTOVICH (University of Pennsylvania)
RAM YAMARTHY (University of Pennsylvania)
[View Abstract]

International Funding Liquidity
AYTEK MALKHOZOV (McGill University)
PHILIPPE MUELLER (London School of Economics)
ANDREA VEDOLIN (London School of Economics)
GYURI VENTER (Copenhagen Business School)
[View Abstract] [Download Preview]
Discussants:
STEFANO GIGLIO (University of Chicago)
AMIR YARON (University of Pennsylvania)
PIERLUIGI BALDUZZI (Boston College)
JEAN-SEBASTIEN FONTAINE (Bank of Canada)

https://www.aeaweb.org/aea/2015conference/program/preliminary.php

Economics of Household Decisions in Finance - Research Papers 2015





Retirement Savings and Household Decisions (E2)

Presiding: OLIVIA MITCHELL (University of Pennsylvania)

Liquidity in Retirement Savings Systems: An International Comparison
JOHN BESHEARS (Harvard Business School)
JAMES CHOI (Yale University)
CHRISTOPHER HARRIS (University of Cambridge)
DAVID LAIBSON (Harvard University)
BRIGITTE C. MADRIAN (Harvard University)
[View Abstract] [Download Preview]

The Composition Effect of Consumption Around Retirement: Evidence from Singapore
SUMIT AGARWAL (National University of Singapore)
JESSICA PAN (National University of Singapore)
WENLAN QIAN (National University of Singapore)
[View Abstract]

Defined Contribution Pension Plans: Mutual Fund Asset Allocation Changes
CLEMENS SIALM (University of Texas-Austin)
LAURA STARKS (University of Texas-Austin)
HANJIANG ZHANG (Nanyang Technological University)
[View Abstract] [Download Preview]

The Retirement Consumption Puzzle in China
HONGBIN LI (Tsinghua University)
XINZHENG SHI (Tsinghua University)
BINZHEN WU (Tsinghua University)
[View Abstract] [Download Preview]
Discussants:
CHRISTOPHER CARROLL (Johns Hopkins University)
JEFFREY R. BROWN (University of Illinois-Urbana-Champaign and NBER)
JEREMY TOBACMAN (University of Pennsylvania)
EUGENE AMROMIN (Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago)




Household Risk, Credit, and Insurance (E2)

Presiding: FELICIA IONESCU (Federal Reserve Board)
Risky, Lumpy Human Capital in Household Portfolios
KARTIK B. ATHREYA (Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond)
FELICIA IONESCU (Federal Reserve Board)
URVI NEELAKANTAN (Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond)
[View Abstract] [Download Preview]

No One Saw This Coming: Inferring Income and Wealth Risks from Consumption Choices during the Great Recession
MARNIX AMAND (Universite de Lausanne)
[View Abstract]

Modeling the Revolving Revolution: The Role of IT Reconsidered
LUKASZ DROZD (University of Pennsylvania)
RICARDO SERRANO-PADIAL (University of Wisconsin-Madison)
[View Abstract] [Download Preview]

Evaluating Long-Term-Care Policy Options, Taking the Family Seriously
DANIEL BARCZYK (McGill University)
MATTHIAS KREDLER (Universidad Carlos III Madrid)
[View Abstract] [Download Preview]


Insurance and Behavioral Economics: Policy Implications (D1, G2)

Presiding: HOWARD KUNREUTHER (University of Pennsylvania)


Procrastination, Present-Biased Preferences, and Financial Behaviors
JEFFREY R. BROWN (University of Illinois-Urbana-Champaign and NBER)
ALESSANDRO PREVITERO (University of Western Ontario)
[View Abstract] [Download Preview]

Experiments on the Role of Emotions in Insurance Decision Making: Implications for Behavioral Welfare Economics
HOWARD KUNREUTHER (University of Pennsylvania)
MARK PAULY (University of Pennsylvania)
[View Abstract] [Download Preview]

Deterrents to Insurance Purchases: Distrust and Zero Aversion
RICHARD J. ZECKHAUSER (Harvard University)
ALEXANDRA DE FILIPPO (Harvard University)
JIYOUNG HAN (Harvard University)
CLAUDIA NEWMAN-MARTIN (Harvard University)
TIMOTHY CHESTON (Harvard University)
[View Abstract] [Download Preview]
Discussants:
DAVID LAIBSON (Harvard University)
ROBERT SHILLER (Yale University)
MAUREEN CROPPER (University of Maryland)


https://www.aeaweb.org/aea/2015conference/program/preliminary.php

Economics of Natural Resource Use: Benefits, Costs and Policy Response - Research Papers 2015

Econometric Society

Natural Resource Use: Benefits, Costs and Policy Response (Q3)

Presiding: JUDITH CHEVALIER (Yale University)


The Short-Term Population Health Effects of Weather and Pollution: Implications of Climate Change
NICOLAS R. ZIEBARTH (Cornell University)
[View Abstract]

Winning the Oil Lottery: The Impact of Natural Resource Extraction on Growth
TIAGO V. CAVALCANTI (University of Cambridge)
DANIEL DA MATA (University of Cambridge)
FREDERIK GIANCARLO TOSCANI (University of Cambridge)
[View Abstract] [Download Preview]


Diesel Cars and Environmental Policy
ANDERS MUNK-NIELSEN (University of Copenhagen)
[View Abstract] [Download Preview]


Dynamic Natural Monopoly Regulation: Time Inconsistency, Asymmetric Information, and Political Environments
CLAIRE LIM (Cornell University)
ALI YURUKOGLU (Stanford University)
[View Abstract] [Download Preview]


https://www.aeaweb.org/aea/2015conference/program/preliminary.php

Economics of Labor & Employment Relations - Research Papers - 2015






LERA Papers I: Discrimination and Segregation: Measurement, Detection, and Litigation (J8)
Presiding: BARBARA LEE (Rutgers University)
The Disability Employment Puzzle: A Field Experiment on Employer Hiring Behavior
MASON AMERI (Rutgers University)
LISA SCHUR (Rutgers University)
MEERA ADYA (Syracuse University)
SCOTT BENTLEY (Rutgers University)
DOUGLAS L. KRUSE (Rutgers University)
[View Abstract] [Download Preview]
Occupational Gender Representation in Canada
SAMI BIBI (Independent Labor Researcher)
[View Abstract]
How Viable is Resolving Hispanic Employment Discrimination through Litigation?
HELEN LAVAN (DePaul University)
[View Abstract] [Download Preview]
Discussants:
BARBARA LEE (Rutgers University)
VALERIE WILSON (Economic Policy Institute)
WILLIAM RODGERS III (Rutgers University)



LERA/IAFFE Papers II: The Work-Family Interface (J1)
Presiding: MARLENE KIM (University of Massachusetts-Boston)
Availability of Family-Friendly Work Practices and Implicit Wage Costs: New Evidence from Canada
ALI FAKIH (Lebanese American University)
[View Abstract] [Download Preview]
The Effect of Paid Family Leave on Employment and Earnings Volatility: Evidence from California
MICHAEL CARR (University of Massachusetts-Boston)
EMILY WIEMERS (University of Massachusetts-Boston)
[View Abstract]
Bringing Home the Bacon: Unpacking the Relationship between Breadwinner Status and Salary
COLLEEN MANCHESTER (University of Minnesota)
LISA LESLIE (New York University)
PATRICIA CAULFIELD DAHM (University of Minnesota)
[View Abstract]
Discussants:
ALAN BENSON (University of Minnesota)
TONY FANG (Monash University)
JESSICA MILLI (Institute for Women's Policy Research)



LERA Papers III: Labor and the Macro and Regional Economies (J1)
Presiding: MARK PRICE (Keystone Research Center)
Economic Development in the Massachusetts Life Sciences Cluster: Shared Prosperity or a Big Tradeoff?
BRANDYN HOLGATE (University of Massachusetts-Boston)
[View Abstract]
CEO Compensation and Mortgage Origination in the Banking Industry
YUANYUAN SUN (University of Illinois-Urbana-Champaign)
[View Abstract]
Labor Relations in a Financialized Economy: Investigating the Effects of Corporate and Household Finance
BERT AZIZOGLU (New School)
[View Abstract]
Apprenticeship to Entrepreneurship: A Role for Business Schools
CIHAN BILGINSOY (University of Utah)
ZHAO JIN (University of Utah)
[View Abstract]
Discussants:
MARK PRICE (Keystone Research Center)


LERA Papers IV: Stakeholder and Shareholder Voice: Outcomes for Competitiveness, Development, and Social Responsibility (J4)
Presiding: BETTY BARRETT (Massachusetts Institute of Technology)
The Influence of Employee Unions on Corporate Social Performance
MUHAMMAD UMAR BOODOO (University of Toronto)
[View Abstract]
Work Organization and Problem Solving in Stakeholder and Shareholder Environments
HEIKE NOLTE (University of Applied Sciences Emden)
PETER DORMAN (Evergreen State College)
[View Abstract]
Discussants:
BETTY BARRETT (Massachusetts Institute of Technology)
ALAN BENSON (University of Minnesota)
JESSICA NEMBHARD (City University of New York)



LERA Papers V: Industry and Occupation Studies of Employment Relations (J1)
Presiding: DAVID LEWIN (University of California-Los Angeles)
The Impacts of Unionization and Occupational Regulation Coverage on Employee Compensation in Canada
TINGTING ZHANG (University of Toronto)
XIAOYU HUANG (University of Toronto)
[View Abstract]
How to Screen Miners' Skills: Recruiting in the Coal Mining in Early Twentieth Century Japan
MAYO SAKAI (University of Tokyo)
[View Abstract] [Download Preview]
Unionism and Productivity in West Virginia Coal Mining: A Longer View
WILLIAM BOAL (Drake University)
[View Abstract] [Download Preview]
Occupational and Industrial Mobility among U.S. Truck Drivers: Are Truckers Different from other Blue Collar Workers?
STEPHEN BURKS (University of Minnesota-Morris)
KRISTEN MONACO (U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics)
[View Abstract] [Download Preview]
Discussants:
HOWARD WIAL (Brookings Institution)
PETER ORAZEM (Iowa State University)


Labor & Employment Relations Association
LERA Papers VI: Job Quality and Job Satisfaction (J4)
Presiding: FRANÇOISE CARRÉ (University of Massachusetts-Boston)
Union Membership and Job Satisfaction: First Evidence from French Linked Employer-Employee Data
PATRICE LAROCHE (Europe Business School-Paris)
[View Abstract] [Download Preview]
Within and between Firm Trends in Job Polarization: Role of Globalization and Technology
SARI PEKKALA KERR (Wellesley College)
TERHI MACZULSKIJ (University of Jyvaskyla)
MIKA MALIRANTA (ETLA)
[View Abstract]
The Union Wage Premium in Canada's Private Sector from 1997 to 2012
EYOB FISSUH (Human Resources and Skills Development Canada)
CRAIG ESCHUK (Employment and Social Development Canada)
[View Abstract]
The Effect of Market-Based Policy Change on Job Quality: Direct Care Work in a Context of Managed Care
ELIZABETH NISBET (Rutgers University)
[View Abstract]
Discussants:
PETER DORMAN (Evergreen State College)
EILEEN APPELBAUM (Center for Economic and Policy Research)



LERA Papers VII: Employment Relations and Organizational Performance (J5)
Presiding: PHANINDRA V. WUNNAVA (Middlebury College)
Empirical Evidence on Diversity and Performance in Teams: The Roles of Task Focus, Status and Tenure
AVNER BEN-NER (University of Minnesota)
JOHN-GABRIEL LICHT (University of Minnesota)
JIN PARK (University of Minnesota)
[View Abstract]
Positive Labor Relations as a Key Component of Seaport Competitiveness
JORDAN COWMAN (University of Texas-Dallas)
JERALD ZELLHOEFER (AFL-CIO)
[View Abstract] [Download Preview]
Assessing Union Activities and Its Influence on Performance of Unionized Firms in Ghana
GABRIEL DWOMOH (Kumasi Polytechnic)
KOFI KWARTENG (Takoradi Polytechnic)
[View Abstract] [Download Preview]
Relational Coordination: Reviewing the Theory and Evidence
JODY HOFFER GITTELL (Brandeis University)
CAROLINE LOGAN (Brandeis University)
[View Abstract]
Discussants:
PHANINDRA V. WUNNAVA (Middlebury College)
CHRISTINE BISHOP (Brandeis University)


LERA Papers VIII: Micro and Macro Effects of Employer-Provided Job Benefits (J3)
Presiding: JAMES BANG (St. Ambrose University)
Rethinking Employment Relations: The Social Bargain, Pensions, and Price Stability
AARON PACITTI (Siena College)
[View Abstract] [Download Preview]
Is There a Link between Employer-Provided Health Insurance and Job-Mobility? Evidence from Recent Micro Data
BENJAMIN CHUTE (Middlebury College)
PHANINDRA V. WUNNAVA (Middlebury College)
[View Abstract]
Exploring the Relationship of Employment Benefits to the Financial Burden and Health Outcomes of Certain Blood Cancer Patients
GREGORY A. ABEL (Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard University)
RANDY ALBELDA (University of Massachusetts-Boston)
DIANA SALAS CORONADO (University of Massachusetts-Boston)
[View Abstract]
Discussants:
JAMES BANG (St. Ambrose University)
FRANÇOISE CARRÉ (University of Massachusetts-Boston)
CRUZ BUENO (Siena College)

Returns to Child and Education Interventions - Research Papers 2015

Jan 05, 2015 1:00 pm, Boston Marriott Copley, Tufts
Society of Government Economists

Returns to Child and Education Interventions (I2, D1)

Presiding: QUENTIN WODON (World Bank)

Returns to Schooling around the World
HARRY ANTHONY PATRINOS (World Bank)
CLAUDIO E. MONTENEGRO (University of Chile)
[View Abstract] [Download Preview]

Measuring the Economic Cost of Child Marriage
QUENTIN WODON (World Bank)
[View Abstract]
Demystifying the East Asian Education Tigers
ELIZABETH KING (World Bank)
HALSEY ROGERS (World Bank)
[View Abstract]

The Impact of Early Childhood Shocks on the Evolution of Cognitive and Non-cognitive Skills
JESSICA LEIGHT (Williams College)
PAUL GLEWWE (University of Minnesota)
ALBERT PARK (Hong Kong University of Science and Technology)
[View Abstract] [Download Preview]
Discussants:
ELIZABETH KING (World Bank)
QUENTIN WODON (World Bank)
PAUL GLEWWE (University of Minnesota)
HARRY ANTHONY PATRINOS (World Bank)

https://www.aeaweb.org/aea/2015conference/program/preliminary.php