Showing posts with label Operations Management. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Operations Management. Show all posts

Wednesday, March 16, 2016

Research Opportunities in Lean Production




Implementing lean production systems: research areas and opportunities for future studies
Giuliano Almeida Marodin* and Tarcisio Abreu Saurin
Department of Industrial Engineering and Transportation (DEPROT), Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS),
Porto Alegre, Brazil

International Journal of Production Research
Volume 51, Issue 22, 2013


This article had the objective of identifying the main areas of research on LP implementation and to propose research opportunities. The literature review was based on 102 studies published in the years between 1996 and 2012.

Six research areas were identified by the authors:
(a) structure and scope of the LP implementation;
(b) factors that influence in
the LP implementation;
(c) methods for implementing LP systems;
(d) LP assessment methods;
(e) the results of implementing
LP systems; and
(f ) adaptation of LP to particular sectors.



The opportunities for future research .

None of the studies on methods of implementing LP mentions the factors that influence the process. Similarly, the methods for assessing the LP implementation level do not take into account the particularities of specific sectors. In fact, it seems that LP area  would benefit from integration. Studies across the research areas could also support a better understanding on why companies are successful or not in using lean. For instance, it could be investigated the extent to which the factors that affect the use of LP are present in the companies that exhibit the best results in terms of performance metrics. Of course, the impact of specific variables within each research area could also be studied – e.g. it could be investigated if the methods for LP implementation differ, or if they should differ, according to variables such as company size, product type and process type.


In the paper drawbacks of LP have also been identified, such as:
(a) the difficulty of using LP as a business system in sectors other than manufacturing, as the use of lean in other sectors is often limited to some practices and principles;
(b) the lack of in-depth knowledge on why companies fail or succeed in their lean efforts; this drawback is aggravated by the lack of studies reporting failed implementations of LP;
(c) the lack of understanding on the complex dynamics involving the use of LP in all areas of a company; and (d) the lack of effective theories and practices to manage the systemic, human and organisational dimensions of lean. This lack is in contrast with the relatively more developed body of knowledge on the use of lean practices.

Monday, November 25, 2013

Lean Manufacturing - Production - Research Papers and Thesis



Exploring organizational translation A case study of changes toward Lean Production
Jostein Langstrand
February 2012

Department of Management and Engineering
Linköping University, SE-581 83 Linköping, Sweden

The thesis is based on a longitudinal case study that has focused on the
introduction of the management concept Lean in a large Swedish
manufacturing company. The study has been performed in two phases. In
the first phase, a series of retrospective interviews have been performed with
employees at all hierarchical levels within the company. The second phase
of the study has been based on a prospective approach. This phase has
comprised a combination of interviews, observations and document studies,
with focus on a pilot project within the company. The study was performed
between 2007 and 2011 and covers events between 2003 and 2011.
http://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:503206/FULLTEXT03

Saturday, November 17, 2012

Organizational Ambidextertiy - Research Issues and Theory



Antecedents to ambidexterity competency in high technology organizations
Pages 134-151
Aravind Chandrasekaran, Kevin Linderman, Roger Schroeder
Journal of Operations Management, Jan-Feb 2012



Organizational ambidexterity has emerged as a new research paradigm in organization theory.
Four central tensions or research areas were examined in this paper
Should organizations achieve ambidexterity through differentiation or through integration?
Does ambidexterity occur at the individual or organizational level?
Must organizations take a static or dynamic perspective on ambidexterity?
Can ambidexterity arise internally, or do firms have to externalize some processes?


Organizational Ambidexterity: Balancing Exploitation and Exploration for Sustained Performance
Sebastian Raisch, Julian Birkinshaw, Gilbert Probst, Michael L. Tushman
OrganizationScience
Vol. 20, No. 4, July–August 2009, pp. 685–695
http://orgsci.journal.informs.org/content/20/4/685.full.pdf



UNPACKING ORGANIZATIONAL AMBIDEXTERITY:
DIMENSIONS, CONTINGENCIES, AND SYNERGISTIC EFFECTS
QING CAO, ERIC GEDAJLOVIC, HONGPING ZHANG
Forthcoming in Organization Science.



Organizational Ambidexterity: IBM and Emerging Business Opportunities
Charles O’Reilly, J. Bruce Harreld, Michael L. Tushman
Stanford GSB Research Paper No. 2025
Rock Center for Corporate Governance Working Paper No. 53
May 2009
https://gsbapps.stanford.edu/researchpapers/library/RP2025.pdf



Building Ambidexterity Into an Organization
Julian Birkinshaw and Cristina Gibson
MITSloan Management Review, SUMMER 2004     VOL.45 NO.4